I’m really hoping that there’s no right or wrong answer to
this question because I feel like this is a pretty fluid/broad class, “Writing
& Editing in Print & Online.” When people (read: family members on
holiday breaks) ask me what classes I’m taking among other questions like why
I’m still single, my major, etc. I have a hard time defining this class in
particular. In my other English class, Rhetoric, I rattle off Aristotle’s
definition of rhetoric and list off the philosophers that we study and how their
lens shapes the way we discuss issues. My other classes are pretty
self-explanatory and WEPO always seems to be the one I struggle with. Some of
the concepts we discuss are pretty straightforward like the circulation of
ideas but it’s been really interesting to view them through the ‘online’ lens.
And studying the readings we’ve looked at has given a lot of insight to how
much is changing with the advent of the innovation age.
Being an
advertising major, I also greatly appreciate that this class highlights design and
its role in publishing. I think its pertinence has a new level in the
implication of digital media. I think that exigence would also be considered
one of the core concepts of the class, and I think that its relevance goes far
beyond it being the first thing we studied when we read Bitzer’s piece. I think
exigence and its role in rhetoric gives us a new way to view everything about
digital media, and I really enjoy studying WEPO through this lens. I think our
concept of exigence is also tied in with the way we analyze texts, so I’d say
analyzing is a core principle as well. I’d also say that collaboration and editing
are key parts of this class, and our group work has been invaluable to our
growth in this class – regardless of how much we groan when Joe asks us to
switch seats every class. I’ve enjoyed studying these concepts with everyone
and I appreciate how interactive he’s structured this class to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment